Discardings Happiness

The man expanded knowledge, faced competitions, assumed to be able and dominated empires, but solitary only became and. ' ' The virtual world created a new habitat it human being, characterized for the encapsulamento on itself exactly and the lack of the touch, the tato and of contact humano.' ' (BOFF, 1999, pg. 11). The happiness initially dreamed did not happen. Understood happiness as the world of values, being this a positive, interpersonal value and historically determined. ' ' How Discardings same consider in them in? Meditaes' ' , we were another time to search the beddings and we find then it in Aristotle (the 384-322 C.) when says that the necessary man of company of another human being to become more human, consequentemente more solidary. We need changes in the form to think, of structural and epistemolgica form, perceiving the man mere stops beyond the competitive being by its very nature, but at the same time solidary for option, surpassing the vision reducionista economist of last the four centuries. The economy grew, the world was changedded, and ours to coexist taken new humanitarian it lacks of reflection and of position.

Moment to advance of the cartesian model for a new construction of knowing, including the challenge of the complex human being and with multiple concomitant integrations. One to be integral bio-psico-social-spiritual and worried about the habitat and the quality of life of all. New proposal, new paradigm: Assmann and Sung (2000) defend that the happiness as the essential end of the man is on proper itself, but also all the planet, requiring for that ' ' the solidarity desire if transforms into personalized vital necessity as proper experience in an increasing number of the inhabitants of this planeta' '. The essence human being is seen not as based on the rationality, but on our capacity to desire ones for the others a true joy of living, a solidary love that if complements in the happiness of the other, while the other equal a proper itself.